ClusterMAX 3.0 launch evidence
ClusterMAX 3.0 has been released. Open the reader view or the source-bound ledger. The ledger covers 17 selected provider assignments; it does not claim complete review of all 77 providers. Exact retrieval hashes are in source observations.
Observation and scoring are separate
Schema secondrun.launch-claims.v2 records SUPPLIED, PARTIAL, NOT_IN_REVIEWED_SOURCES and NOT_REVIEWED findings. Partial and unreviewed findings carry explicit limitations and sources. These are limits of this review, not assertions that evidence does not exist. The v1 template and validator remain supported for historical records.
The ledger accepts Participation Ribbon and Unavailable as observations. The unchanged five-tier scorer refuses Participation Ribbon; Unavailable is never converted into Underperforming or a failed job. A new mapping requires a separately identified plan and post-release disclosure. No six-tier probability is invented here.
Use
python scripts/launch_ledger.py launch/claims-3.0.observed.json
python scripts/launch_ledger.py launch/claims-3.0.observed.json --plan path/to/plan.json --output binding-draft.json
A binding draft requires compatible tiers, sources and rating version. It does not register a study or authenticate external timestamps. Validate the complete submission before relying on a result.
Chronology
The original instrument was published earlier on release day at ee650e3. Consolidated v1.3 (448e003) was created locally at 21:16 UTC (self-reported commit time, not an independent clock) and first reached GitHub at 21:27:08 UTC -- after the cited 3.0 article's own recorded datePublished of 21:20:29 UTC. Neither code publication establishes a preregistered real customer cohort. This ledger is post-release work. Plans can still prospectively predict future jobs; freeze their design, predictions and mapping before observing those outcomes.
The complete 77-provider transcription and transition record remain separate. The inspected article is recorded as methodology_source. The exact 3.0 rubric remains unverified, so this observation ledger cannot emit a real binding yet.
2026-09-29
- The site navigation on clustermax.ai now marks 3.0 (Sep, 2026) as current. Its criteria index and ten criterion pages were captured at 18:29-18:31 UTC (hashes in
binding-3.0-2026-09-29.json). The pages carry no rubric version of their own, and the 2026-09-23 copy of/criteriahas a different hash, so they are recorded as the live site rubric, not as a version-stamped 3.0 rubric. claims-3.0.rubric-2026-09-29.jsonis a copy of the observed ledger withmedal_table_sourceset to the release-3.0 recorded source andrubric_sourceset to those pages. The observed ledger itself is unchanged.binding-3.0-2026-09-29.jsonis the resulting binding draft (13 medals in the five frozen tiers;bound_at21:56 UTC). It hasplan_sha256: nullbecause no plan exists, so it scores nothing.scripts/challenge.py's binding checks pass on it against the registered ClusterMAX 3.0 sources and transcription once a plan hash is supplied, and refuse it as written. Participation Ribbon and Unavailable observations are listed separately and are not inmedals.- R2 (
../retrospective/PLAN-R2.md,../retrospective/results/R2-result.md) compares the 3.0 medals with status-page incidents in the 180 days before release. It is retrospective and does not change any statement above about the prospective test.