Inspect before allocating.
Read actual GPU occupancy, available RAM and tensor headers. Review the exact device, model revision, local image, context, RAM cap and deadline. Existing services stay untouched.
MiMo-V2.6 / ONE-CARD EXPERIMENT
Keep the model and the benchmark.
Change where the weights live.
An inspectable test for one card in your Blackwell tower, with host-memory offload, an explicit resource budget, and your own scorer.
Local inspection first. Model loading needs your approval.
Can one GPU plus sufficient host RAM run this complete checkpoint under your benchmark’s real constraints? The runner is ready to test that. Native MiMo inference: not yet run.
01 / PREPARE
Choose the model and evaluation path.
Copy one brief into your existing local agent.
First establish real load and generation behavior. A canary produces no benchmark score.
Linux or WSL2 · Python 3.10+ · Docker + NVIDIA runtime · complete local checkpoint · compatible local vLLM image
Inspect → review the plan → approve a canary → benchmark.
02 / EXECUTION
Model custody, execution and scoring remain separate. A refused load is a useful result.
Read actual GPU occupancy, available RAM and tensor headers. Review the exact device, model revision, local image, context, RAM cap and deadline. Existing services stay untouched.
After approval, hash the complete checkpoint and test the real loader. Exactly one GPU is exposed to the isolated container. The runner retains errors and cleans up only its own job.
Use frozen independent requests or your existing harness through a temporary local endpoint. Preserve its scorer, tools, prompt formatting, reasoning budget and deadlines. Score with the original evaluator.
THE MEMORY BOUNDARY
Pro reports 1.02T parameters with 42B active per token. Routing can select different experts at different positions. This test retains the complete checkpoint and moves residency into real host RAM instead of deleting experts.
The current candidate uses vLLM CPU offload. It is not an NVMe-streaming port of the Kimi runner. Storage precision, loaded precision, KV state and transfer costs all affect fit. A missing RAM budget stays a blocker.
03 / INSPECT
Read the code here before running anything.
Source previews fetch only this site’s static files.
Select a file to inspect its source. No local machine access is required.
04 / EVIDENCE
Control tests qualify the controller.
The model still has to earn its result.
Synthetic checkpoint and mocked-process tests. No model inference.
Copy, selection, source inspection, download and mobile checks. Inspect runs ↗
Load, memory use, throughput, numerical agreement and benchmark scores remain unmeasured.
Aperture contributes permissioned hardware inspection and explicit placement. The Kimi experiments contribute source-bound state checks and accounting for constrained execution. Their Kimi-specific streaming kernels have not been ported to MiMo here.
The retained K3 strict-state result covered 93 layer caches at two accepted positions and reported 1.38× canonical improvement against a 588-second/token baseline. That is a narrow state-fidelity result, not a MiMo performance forecast.
Osmantic’s public lab lists a Blackwell tower with two 96 GB RTX PRO 6000 cards and vLLM. This candidate selects only one. The lab does not establish the host-RAM budget or current occupancy, so the local inspection supplies those facts before a load.
READY TO INSPECT